Skip to content

Tall Dark Rookie Catcher Network

The Giants bounced into the playoffs on Sunday on the strength of some solid pitching, a little bit of here-and-there hitting, and one big fly from a rookie catcher who plays as though he’s had some kind of Cal Ripken Jr poise-transplant. To call Buster Posey “old school” is a misnomer; there weren’t many 23 year-olds like this back then, either. I wouldn’t say that faith is my strong suit as a baseball fan, and my early sense in both of the first two San Diego games was that the Giants would lose. But the final game had a different feeling, and despite a largely average offense, when their pitching has been on it’s really been on. I called Posey’s home run, despite his 0 for 12 mark to that point in the series. “Right here Buster – take him deep,” I said aloud and to myself, watching my small computer screen. Outside of a few profanities, it had been the only thing I’d muttered in three days. I make no predictions moving forward to the playoffs, and those hung up on such things obviously don’t get it. This was the culmination of a 162 game season and the Giants won the West. If you can’t wrap your head around that, then you’re a Yankee fan, and one who misses the point that even their most stirring recent season came in 2001 when they came up short in the World Series.

In a less competitive realm, I took in two movies in recent weeks – Woody Allen’s You Will Meet A Tall Dark Stranger and David Fincher’s The Social Network.  The decision to see both was based largely on positive reviews – specifically David Denby’s for the Allen film. I’ll generally take a chance on most things Woody does, and have no real problem with his tireless insistence on life’s meaninglessness. But I failed to channel Denby’s experience of the film and can’t bring myself to proclaim it “perverse and fascinating.” Much of Allen’s late-life work is reminiscent of George Carlin’s final routines, minus the overt bitterness and served in a slightly more urbane manner. Still, it’s always inspiring to see Josh Brolin portray a dumpy, middle-aged, has-been novelist who can seduce the stunningly beautiful and engaged young woman across the courtyard by explaining that he’s been spying on her through the window.

Social Network was a different deal entirely, and despite my initial resistance to the subject matter I found it to be a quick-moving two hours. While by no means a flattering portrayal of Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg, I wouldn’t call it a hit piece, either. As the credits rolled, the well put-together dude sitting next to me with his girlfriend remarked “that movie did its job – I wanted to punch that guy in the face.” Curiously, my experience was quite the opposite, and while assuming that much of the content was highly fictionalized, my post-viewing impression of the Zuckerberg character was more favorable than what little I’ve pieced together about the real-life kid billionaire. Maybe if Zuckerberg had the West Wing writer feeding him the same snappy, condescending dialogue, he’d come off as equally unlikable but a bit more defined. In any case, The Social Network’s message that life is unfair is still marginally more palatable if no more reasonable than Woody Allen’s that it has no point at all.

Miller

nagooshedThe filmmaker formerly known as Scott Miller visited me last week, under his current incarnation “Coleman.” He’s explained this decision to push his middle name front and center as an attempt to stand out more in the increasingly Internet-oriented world of independent film making, but it still escapes my limited comprehension. If a guy as personality-laden as Miller has to lean on gimmick to get noticed, what hope could there possibly be for the rest of us? Still, he’s always handled my rockheaded resistance to his evolution with characteristic Midwestern aplomb, and typically diffuses my ill-timed if affectionate barbs with a well-placed “settle down, tough guy ..”

Though he’s currently booked on an indefinite engagement at the Chicago-based Arthur Miller Workshop for Kinetic Sculpture, the success of Scott’s recent New York City program may be a sign of things to come. He prefaced one short work, Bony Orbit, involving a copulating couple juxtaposed with an instructional film on the workings of the human eye with the qualification “well, I think it’s a riot, but we’ll see how it goes ..” This balance between self-contained amusement and an intense desire to connect with a larger audience has been something I’ve long admired in Miller, along with the obvious enjoyment he derives from his work. The trade-off of having to get used to “hey, you’ve reached Coleman” on his outgoing message is indeed small price to pay.


Staten Island Lightning From Brooklyn 9.22.10

Loudmouths

These go to eleven .. – Nigel Tufnel

I was at a Giants game in San Francisco last month, sitting in front of some loudmouth who was maintaining a string of ceaseless discourse for his imprisoned seatmates. “Buster Posey – this kid’s terrific, although you won’t get many long balls out of him ..” Posey proceeded to hit the next pitch out of the park – 410 feet to straight-away center field. It was the greatest shut-up moment since Annie Hall, when Woody Allen pulled Marshall McLuhan from out of frame at a movie theater to silence the pompous academic blowhard in line behind him. “You know nothing of my work .. how you ever got to teach a course in anything is totally amazing.” Of course Posey’s shot did nothing to quiet the guy, and he ranted on obliviously for the rest of the game. At one point I took to refuting his inane proclamations, in a conversational tone and without turning around. My buddy Paul rightly told me to let it go. I was in town for Paul’s wedding where I gave a toast and mentioned that Paul isn’t always “the most effusive guy in the room.” It was another way of saying that he isn’t a loudmouth – but I could have just as easily mentioned that he handles them better than I do.

While I admit openly to not being a fan of loudmouths, it isn’t without qualification. Context is everything, and over-modulation alone does not an idiot make. Anyone who knows me well also knows that I’m capable of boosting the volume on the rare occasion I deem worthy. And yet I’ve been accused of being “quiet” by more than a few. The way I see it, if I have to yell over you to get my point across or my line heard, it isn’t worth it. It’s like attempting to be a better writer by switching to a larger font. But these are just my thoughts, and people who maintain opinion-oriented blogs well in to middle-life probably shouldn’t throw stones.

Generally speaking, I also prefer quiet humor. I’m not talking Steven Wright here (although the guy is quite funny) and ‘quiet’ in and of itself isn’t the point. But then again, neither is Howie Mandel . I was watching Will Ferrell on a Letterman rerun the other night, and realized that I’m almost always ready to laugh when I see this guy. And while he can certainly turn it up a notch (as he did this night with his Harry Caray impersonation) it’s never just for the sake of getting loud. Typically he’s completely understated – with Letterman “deferring” was an appropriate term. And yet he’s funny as hell.

As with all things there are exceptions, and Sam Kinison never would have made it with Bob Newhart’s delivery. But when it comes to loudmouths, humor and exceptions, I defer to Fran Lebowitz’ remarks on dogs. She was arguing against their usefulness (an opinion I do not share) and noted that even some dog-haters will make an exception in the case of the pathologically lonely and the blind. “But I have a solution,” she explained. “Let the lonely lead the blind.” I’m not as clever as Lebowitz, but were I to construct an equally good line relating to loudmouths I would hope that, like her, I’d go with the understated delivery.

Late Greats

Squash Hashanah

I make no claim to being a photographer, but my great-grandfather was one by trade. It seems to me there have been two kinds of memorable pictures taken since the invention of picture-taking: those given much thought prior to execution, and those that came about because some guy had a camera. And just about every guy has a camera these days, outside of self-professed Luddites and some prisoners. The second part of the photography equation used to involve darkness and chemicals, but with the advent of limitless digital storage this necessity is gone. Now, whether it’s an old glass plate or an iPhone snap, it comes down to if anyone does anything with it after. In this sense my father has been as responsible for his grandfather’s notoriety as was the man himself, by virtue of getting his images out there. There are no doubt countless examples (now multiplying daily and exponentially) of magnificent photographs that nobody will ever see. But this isn’t unusual, and can be said for a lot of things.

The three snaps above, while not technically impressive, are relevant because they were taken with my new cell phone in late August and early September. Sequentially, they are of California, Nevada (Lake Tahoe), and New York (Brooklyn). If part of who we are can be ascertained from where we’ve been, then this new technology is of some worth even if we’re just flicking through our phone with a finger. Don’t ask me to break down what it’s worth though; I personally think it’s an example of a little too much all moving a little too fast.

Mad Good

I’m just going to put this one out there. While I’m still squarely in the camp of The Sopranos, last Sunday’s episode of Mad Men – “The Suitcase” – was as good as anything I’ve seen on television in a very long time. Much mention was made of the strong writing for female characters on HBO’s mob series, but I’d now officially take the waspy, buttoned-down, sexually dominant and functionally psychotic Peggy Olson over former (and pre-Carmela) First Lady Rosie Aprile in a twelve-round contest any day. If TV is still the most prominent marker of popular culture, Feminism has stepped to plate in a manner that makes Gloria Steinem look like Morganna The Kissing Bandit. Interestingly, it’s done so in a 1960s-based series created in the 2000’s. Of course the two shows share many common ties, but that’s another matter.

Speaking of twelve-rounders, the ’65 Ali-Liston fight provided appropriate backdrop for this episode, and one can imagine how the writers – and in this specific case creator Matthew Weiner – began with this simple premise and expanded on it. “Suitcase” (and this is quite literally what Don Draper has become – a case in a suit) was as subtle and nuanced as an Ali jab and as punishing as a Liston uppercut. In the end it was Draper filling the Liston position, looking up from the mat at Peggy Olson’s Ali and offering an uncharacteristically and strongly feminine hand atop hers as appreciative gesture. As brilliantly as this played out, the show – much like The Sopranos – never settles for simple or contrived resolution. Olson may have been the last woman standing, but nobody cleans up from a fight like Draper.

There were at least another dozen outstanding points worth mention. The underlying, under-played, and almost completely unstated sexual tension hung over the episode like a looming thunderhead. The all-trumping, and again Soprano-reminiscent theme of maternal power (in this case Peggy’s over Don) was executed beautifully. And the show continues to portray alcoholism in all of its nuanced, falsely seductive, and retching glory. To cap it all off, we learn in this episode that Bertram Cooper quite literally has no balls – at the same time as the plot is deftly unveiling that none are necessary to dish out a serious ass-kicking. As good as the acting on this show has been, the players would be well-advised to slip a little something extra in the writers’ pockets come this Christmas, if only for this latest effort.

Downtime Googling

God it’s such a drag when you’re living in the past – Petty

I received an email from my buddy Denis Munro last week, commenting on a piece I’d written some time ago. Denis had a long and successful career as head of city planning in Perth, Scotland, and now keeps his feet wet with consulting work several days a week. It was from this office that he’d written, confessing apologetically that he was reading my stuff within the context of downtime googling. He was going through my entire site systematically and comprehensively, reading each post date by date. While I’m not entirely devoid of self-promotional instinct, this seemed an act of penance better suited for the Lockerbie Bomber. He also commented on the pressures that might arise trying to write regularly to “meet reader expectations.” I didn’t bother to explain that those expectations could be easily assuaged with a CC’d email to four; the other part of his point was relevant. I hadn’t felt much like writing lately.

Why write, after all? This question came up yesterday while on the phone with my other buddy Scott (Coleman) Miller, who now lives in Chicago. He’d been out with friends recently, and one woman told him that he needed to write a book. “Your stories are so great,” she reasoned. I asked which stories she was referencing and he mentioned one he’d told her about serving jury duty in San Francisco. One of the attorneys was questioning him as a potential juror and asked if he’d ever been mugged. When Miller answered in the affirmative the guy asked when the incident had taken place. “I’m not sure of the exact date,” he told him, “but it was the night Redd Foxx died.” I had to agree that this was book-worthy material, but it’s so much easier delivered as cocktail party banter, and particularly if you’re a guy like Scott. His ability to interject during tepid conversation and boost the volume from three to eight is unrivaled. Why bother with sitting down at the keyboard and coming up with a clever Sanford and Son intro when you can just spit it out? And, in a nutshell, this covers my frequent aversion to writing – too much pretense and assumption when a conversational volume boost could render it over and done with.

So it was I’d skipped over several writing ideas recently for lack of motivational oomph. I thought of piecing something together about the Tom Petty show I’d seen at Madison Square Garden; how his new CD is better than anything he’s done in years and has been largely misinterpreted. I was going to write something about more “sophisticated” music fans who have dissed Petty over the years because his commercial success and ability to craft intelligent but infectiously catchy singles offends their priggish David Byrne sensibilities. But I refrained, and probably wisely. At another juncture, walking through Manhattan, I saw the large, two-story inflatable rat that NYC labor unions erect in front of non-complying businesses. I considered some opening sentences for a post on when one actually becomes a New Yorker – the subtle psychological shifts and transitions from novel to familiar. But my brain soon tired and I let go of the idea, letting things settle while staring up at the giant, 15-foot rodent balloon.

A few days on I was in my Brooklyn hood getting some keys made for my landlord who is renting her place back from me this month. This was probably my fourth visit to this particular locksmith – the landlord has returned on several occasions and tends to lose the keys after each visit. I joked with the guy that it was good business for him and he corrected me. “Actually, I don’t pay the rent cutting keys.” This led to an extended conversation as he carved away at the blanks about how, exactly, he did pay the rent. His bread and butter is house calls, but it turns out that even his business is being usurped by the digital age and house keys are going the way of car keys and an electronic swipe. The machinery necessary to replace these new devices is licensed at an exorbitant rate and requires a shop owner to buy “tokens” with each use – a practice this guy said would put him out of business. I sympathized, explaining that my family was in the film business and digital technology had greatly affected our customer base and the way we invested.

He finished the last key and told me it would be eight dollars and forty-five cents. “My customer base is largely gone,” he said, making change. “When people lock themselves out now, they use one of these things to find a locksmith ..” He mimed gripping an iPhone and flicking through the Internet choices with his finger. “Guess we’re getting old,” I told him, mostly because it seemed like the kind of thing I was supposed to say at that point in the conversation. He smiled knowingly, apparently pleased, and I left the shop. My own smartphone was arriving Fed Ex that afternoon.

San Fran & Tim at the Half

It’s a jaded man indeed who can remain unmoved, flipping his newly acquired cable over to the high-def channels and catching an awe-inspiring aerial shot of San Francisco on a typically cool July evening, just prior to the 10:15 eastern start time of a Mets-Giants game. I’ve made no effort to hide my distaste for some of the city’s less-appealing elements, but generally speaking they have to do with people – be they aggressive street indigents pursuing you with bad intent for politely declining their request for a five, or civic-minded Van Driessen sorts bent on protecting said indigent’s right to pursue. Even a moderately-minded person like myself gets a bit fed up with countless ballot propositions to name a sewage plant after George Bush or change the name of the Golden Gate Bridge to Cesar Chavez Walkway. But pulling back from all of that crap and catching the view from a hill, plane or rooftop can render only one conclusion : this is one beautiful city.

It’s an odd angle on things, being so utterly familiar with one place while observing it from an increasingly familiar but very different other, 2,582 miles away. Add to this an intense connection with the particular setting – ballpark, team and neighborhood – and you’ve got a recipe for a crisis of identity. Luckily, I had Mets announcers Keith Hernandez and Gary Cohen to pull me through. For those familiar with the Giants broadcast team of Mike Krukow and Duane Kuiper, Keith is more or less Mike to Gary’s Duane. (A rough translation at best.)  Hernandez’ unflinching self-love and Bob Dole tendency to talk about himself in the third-person is tempered by his quiet acceptance of Cohen’s occasional ribbing over the ex jock’s famed ego. Less palatable is Keith’s shameless condemnation of any modern-day ballplayer involved in the steroids scandal. Wasn’t this the same guy doing lines off  Mookie Wilson’s batting glove back in ’86? Hypocrisy not withstanding, the two do a decent job and have come to grow on me while accepting the Mets as my pseudo surrogate team and preference by large margin over the Yankees. But that’s another column.

It also didn’t hurt that Tim Lincecum started for the Giants last night, pitched a six-hit complete game shutout, and registered his tenth win of the season. How high has Lincecum set the bar for himself? Consider that he’s 10-4 one game past the break on a weak-hitting team with questionable middle relief, has an ERA under 3.0, leads the league in strikeouts, and yet some have questioned what’s “wrong with him” after a few poor starts. I’m guessing whatever it is, it’s the kind of “wrong” that several other teams would be willing to take a chance on. It has been suggested that Lincecum performs well in cool conditions – something that might bode well for keeping him in a Giants uniform beyond his current contract. Or perhaps he just has an innate sense for the obvious: when two well-matched teams with good pitchers square off on a typically stirring San Francisco night marking the middle of both the baseball and summer seasons, things can often live up to expectation.

Gha Na Na

Based on a novel by a man named Lear – McCartney

Cheap is small, and not too steep
But best of all, cheap is cheap
– Davies

Now that America has bowed somewhat gracefully out of the World Cup, we can all move on to more pressing matters at hand. It’s difficult to hold a grudge against a Ghanaian. The life expectancy for males is only 59 years, so they’re due every international victory that they have coming . If soccer and the occasional Bob Geldoff visit were all that America had to hang on to, we’d likely struggle to keep our proverbial chins held high. And I’ve certainly done enough dead horse beating with my poorly-constructed anti-soccer rants. Although this phenomenon of loss-recovery and why we hate certain opponents more than others might be worth a few more lines. How is it that some Giants fans would suffer a crisis of identity in the absence of their long-despised So Cal rivals? What inspires packs of shorn, shit-faced English lads to descend upon a neighboring village in Third Reich fashion even when the inciting football match is of little consequence? My uneducated guess is that it is due, in large part, to the suffocating and life-numbing lack of motivation that persists in the absence of somebody’s ass to kick. Sure, we’ll sacrifice ourselves beyond all measure in the name of love, but if you really want to get something done you’d better have somebody to hate. And make no mistake – this instinct is not reserved exclusively for the male half of the species. As Elaine Benes remarked on ‘Seinfeld’, commenting on the female version of getting even, “we just tease someone until they develop an eating disorder.” Ask any woman and they’ll likely tell you a broken pint glass to the face is a preferred alternative.

Maybe this explains why I’ve never been a Beatles fan. I don’t typically go public with this admission, because it generally draws a lot of criticism and the response that I’m just trying to be different. But I genuinely don’t care for the group, and despite having listened to a plethora of music in my increasingly long-toothed existence, I’ve never owned a CD, LP, cassette, or even eight-track by the Fab Four. Sure, there’s a select song or two among their vast catalog that I favor – I always dug Paperback Writer, for instance, and felt that it had as good a riff as Day Tripper with better lyrics. Maybe it was McCartney’s somewhat inane but catchy influence on that song that attracted me, and Lennon’s more pervasive but generally toothless All You Need Is Love vibe that pushed me away. I do understand that John was the thinking man’s member of the group, and that it was his cynicism and sardonic “it couldn’t get much worse” contribution to Paul’s “it’s getting better all the time” that kept things in check. But try as I might, I couldn’t get Dear Prudence or I Am The Walrus to fly for me. I much prefer most anything by the Stones, Who, or most consummate of English acts, The Kinks. It’s a shame that some Catcher In The Rye-obsessed kook had to take Lennon out prematurely, but give me Ray Davies lamenting a big, fat mama trying to break him any day. Then again, who asked me?

Soccer Deux

Straight is the gate, and narrow the way – Williams/Christ

My buddy Dave in San Francisco emailed the other day, commenting on my last posting about soccer. While I suspect part of his correspondence (like my article) was meant as tongue in cheek, he did use three rather strong qualifiers – “ignorant,” “reactionary,” and “full of shit.” He also likened me to Jim Rome, which remains a neutral remark for most people outside of Jim Everett.  Still, there was enough there to take a second look at my stance. I played soccer as a kid, and have a nephew who’s already an all-star at nine. While I can’t hear a tag like “The Beautiful Game” without cringing, I do cop to the fact that there’s a certain elegance to the sport. You would certainly never hear me assert that the game moves too slowly or is boring. And I’ve been watching much of the World Cup, whether at home or at a bar in Penn Station waiting for an incoming train.

I root for America, just as I would with any Olympic sport that I pay little attention to outside of that specific event. Heck, I even watched our squad battle to yet another tie against Slovenia yesterday and lamented the phantom foul call that cost them the win. Although unlike baseball, I couldn’t even tell what the blown call was. I still hold out that there’s too much going on with this game that isn’t really going on at all. I did chuckle and feel vindicated in my remarks about feigned injuries when the Slavic player went down writhing in pain until two officials with highway cleanup vests trotted over with a stretcher and sprayed some kind of aerosol crap on his ankle. (What’s in those cans anyway, Broken-Ankle-Away? Magic European Pain Un-doer?) Unfortunately, I’m still holding on to my rockhead line that, outside of international play, the game doesn’t do it for me. I was a bit disappointed to discover how many other knee-jerk anti-soccer rants there were out there, but the fact that these only appear during World Cup season should be an indicator in itself. The same can be said for the postings from the other side, seeking to pin America’s reticence in catching on to some sort of conspiratorial ignorance or knuckle-dragging mentality. Personally, I just enjoying goading pseudo intellectual foreigners who relish Yank-bashing while inhaling Quarter Pounders with cheese on the sly. It really isn’t a bad game at all, and I could just as easily have written a piece on the stirring feeling I got while passing a crew of construction workers in the hot Brooklyn sun, all listening to the Mexico-France match blaring in Spanish from a cement-dusted boom box. But I didn’t. Besides, Dave also favors Formula One racing and the Tour de France – two more Euro-oriented pastimes whose charms escape my Cro-Magnon perception. There will be opportunity to offend in the future.